do_we_need_the_lnt_hypothesis_in_radiation.4-def.pdf
Public access from
01/08/2027
Journal article

Do We Need the LNT Hypothesis in Radiation Protection? Could a Traffic Light Model Be a Practicable Solution?

DOKPE

  • 2025
Published in:
  • Health Physics. - 2025, vol. 130, no. 4, p. 391-397
English Abstract—The linear no-threshold hypothesis (commonly
known as LNT) has received increasing criticism in recent
years. LNT assumes that the damaging effects of ionizing
radiation, that is, stochastic effects such as cancer and genetic
or teratogenic effects, increase linearly with dose and without a
lower dose threshold. However, statistically verified data on the
relationship between radiation and effects are only obtained for
the range above 100 mSv y−1, which is why linear extrapolation
downward is carried out for the range of low radiation doses,
i.e., below 100 mSv y−1. Today’s radiation protection systems
are based on this principle. To place radiation protection on
a different basis (that is, no longer on the LNT hypothesis),
a traffic light model is proposed. It uses natural radiation
exposure as a reference but maintains the existing limits and
everything in radiation protection that has proven effective.
What does change, however, is the lower end of the optimization
range, according to the ALARA recommendation. For the
justification of today’s levels of exceptions, the precautionary
principle is applied.
Faculty
Faculté des sciences et de médecine
Department
Département de Physique
Language
  • English
Classification
Physics
License
License undefined
Open access status
green
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://folia.unifr.ch/unifr/documents/336364
Statistics

Document views: 8 File downloads:
  • do_we_need_the_lnt_hypothesis_in_radiation.4-def.pdf: 1