Sophistry and Eleaticism in Plato's Dialogues
BHAP-PH
1 Online-Ressource (217 Seiten)
PhD: Université de Fribourg, 20.03.2020
English
This study examines the systematic relationship between sophistry and Eleaticism in Plato’s dialogues. While previous research has often focused on individual sophists or ignored the philosophical foundations of their programs, this dissertation fills that gap by analyzing how the sophistical movement appropriated Eleatic thought.The first part analyzes five earlier dialogues—"Protagoras", "Euthydemus", "Hippias Minor", "Hippias Major", and "Gorgias". It argues that Protagoras inverts Parmenides’ "Way of Truth" into a celebration of 'doxa', while the eristics in the "Euthydemus" rely on the Parmenidean denial of Non-Being to claim that false speaking is impossible.The second part investigates the method of 'antilogikē' in the "Parmenides" and "Phaedrus". It claims that Plato portrays contradiction as inherently folded within Eleatic philosophy, where Zeno’s rejection of plurality is used to justify deceptive rhetoric.The final part engages in a close reading of the "Sophist". It relates the initial divisions of the sophist to the results of the earlier dialogues and argues that the final, successful definition depends on the Stranger’s critique of Parmenidean Being and Non-Being. By introducing the 'Form of Difference' ('megista genē'), Plato demonstrates how falsehood is possible, thereby anchoring the sophist’s nature in a coherent framework. The study concludes that the "Sophist" provides an adequate, rather than aporetic, definition of the sophist.
-
Faculty
- Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines
-
Department
- Département de Philosophie
-
Language
-
-
Classification
-
Philosophy, psychology
-
Notes
-
-
License
-
-
Open access status
-
diamond
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://folia.unifr.ch/unifr/documents/334612