Journal article

Argumentation in the interpretation of statutory law and international law : not ejusdem generis

BLE-BLL

  • 24.05.2022
Published in:
  • Languages. - 2022, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 132
English This contribution bridges three fields—pragmatics, argumentation, and law. Arguments
can be seen as the verbal formulation of inferences that articulate justificatory relationships, meaning
that behind every argument is at least one argumentative inference. As an argumentative activity
and verbal practice, legal discourse has gaps to be filled by pragmatic inference. Neo- and post-
Gricean frameworks can thus tentatively be used for its analysis. Based on these frameworks, this
contribution asks whether argumentation in the interpretation of statutory law is the same as in
international law. More precisely, it looks at judges’ legal interpretations, which function as justifying
arguments because they are constrained by rules/canons of interpretation. It is shown that neither a
pragma-dialectical hierarchy of statutory canons nor a hierarchy of related presumptions carries over
to international law where there is no such hierarchy.
Faculty
Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines
Department
Département d'anglais
Language
  • English
Other electronic version

Published version

License
License undefined
Open access status
gold
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://folia.unifr.ch/unifr/documents/320548
Statistics

Document views: 33 File downloads:
  • languages-07-00132-v3.pdf: 28