Lame ducks and divided government: How voters control the unaccountable
Published in:
- Journal of Comparative Economics. - 2018, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 131-144
English
Electoral institutions interact through the incentives they provide to policy makers and voters. In this paper divided government is interpreted as the reaction of voters to a sys- tematic control problem. Voters realize that term-limited executives (“lame ducks”) cannot credibly commit to a moderate electoral platform due to missing reelection incentives. By dividing government control voters force a lame duck to compromise on policies with an opposing legislature. Based on data from the US states, I present evidence showing that the probability of divided government is about 8 to 10 percent higher when governors are lame ducks.
-
Faculty
- Faculté des sciences économiques et sociales et du management
-
Department
- Département d'économie politique
-
Language
-
-
Classification
-
Politics
-
License
-
License undefined
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://folia.unifr.ch/unifr/documents/308548
Statistics
Document views: 37
File downloads:
- schelker_2018lameducksdividedgovernment.pdf: 116