Non-inferentialism about Justification - the Case of Aesthetic Judgments
Published in:
- The Philosophical Quarterly. - 2013, vol. 63, no. 253, p. 660-682
English
In this article, I present two objections against the view that aesthetic judgements – that is, judgemental ascriptions of aesthetic qualities like elegance or harmony – are justified non-inferentially. The first is that this view cannot make sense of our practice to support our aesthetic judgements by reference to lower-level features of the objects concerned. The second objection maintains that non-inferentialism about the justification of aesthetic judgements cannot explain why our aesthetic interest in artworks and other objects is limited to only some of their lower-level features that realise their higher-level aesthetic qualities. Although my concern with the view that aesthetic judgements are subject to non-inferential justification is very general, my discussion is primarily structured around Sibley’s well-developed and influential version of this view.
-
Faculty
- Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines
-
Department
- Département de Philosophie
-
Language
-
-
Classification
-
Philosophy, psychology
-
License
-
License undefined
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://folia.unifr.ch/unifr/documents/304038
Statistics
Document views: 32
File downloads:
- DorschNonInferentialismAestheticJustification_draft.pdf: 63