Journal article
Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
- Binaghi S Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. binaste@hotmail.com
- Maeder P
- Uské A
- Meuwly JY
- Devuyst G
- Meuli RA
- 2001-07-17
Published in:
- European neurology. - 2001
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Carotid Artery, Common
Carotid Stenosis
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Male
Middle Aged
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonography, Doppler
English
PURPOSE
To evaluate the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the quantification of atherosclerotic stenosis of carotid artery bifurcation in comparison with digital substraction angiography (DSA) and Doppler sonography (DS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty-five patients with atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries with proven stenosis by DSA, had spiral CTA, MRA using two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight gradient echo techniques, and DS using Doppler flow signal recording (total 47 carotid artery bifurcations). The degree of stenosis was measured according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria: total occlusion (100%), severe (70-99%), moderate (30-69%) and mild (0-29%). The degree of stenosis measured by CTA, MRA and DS was compared to DSA, used as the gold standard.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven percent of MRA measures were equivalent to DSA, and 3% were underestimated; 96% of CTA measures were equivalent to DSA, and 4% were underestimated; 77% of DS measures were equivalent to DSA, 21% were overestimated and 2% were underestimated.
CONCLUSIONS
CTA and MRA are equally accurate methods in quantifying the degree of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
To evaluate the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the quantification of atherosclerotic stenosis of carotid artery bifurcation in comparison with digital substraction angiography (DSA) and Doppler sonography (DS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty-five patients with atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries with proven stenosis by DSA, had spiral CTA, MRA using two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight gradient echo techniques, and DS using Doppler flow signal recording (total 47 carotid artery bifurcations). The degree of stenosis was measured according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria: total occlusion (100%), severe (70-99%), moderate (30-69%) and mild (0-29%). The degree of stenosis measured by CTA, MRA and DS was compared to DSA, used as the gold standard.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven percent of MRA measures were equivalent to DSA, and 3% were underestimated; 96% of CTA measures were equivalent to DSA, and 4% were underestimated; 77% of DS measures were equivalent to DSA, 21% were overestimated and 2% were underestimated.
CONCLUSIONS
CTA and MRA are equally accurate methods in quantifying the degree of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- closed
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1159/000050752
- PMID 11455180
- Persistent URL
- https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/98683
Statistics
Document views: 13
File downloads: