Journal article
Benefits of hardware removal after plating.
-
Acklin YP
Universitätsspital Basel, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: yvespascal.acklin@gmail.com.
-
Bircher A
University Hospital Basel, Department of Infectiology and Allergology, Basel, Switzerland.
-
Morgenstern M
Universitätsspital Basel, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basel, Switzerland.
-
Richards RG
AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
-
Sommer C
Kantonsspital Graubünden, Department of Traumatology, Chur, Switzerland.
Show more…
English
Routine implant removal is frequently performed although evidence-based guidelines are lacking. But routinely planned implant removal has significant economic implications and shows considerable complication rates. In general, clinical outcome seems to improve but pain relief after operation is often unpredictable. Even in patients reporting implant-related pain, implant removal does not guarantee relief and may be associated with further complications. The intra- and postoperative complication rate remains very high. Implant removal demonstrates a significant learning curve and unsupervised junior surgeons tend to cause more complications. The need for implant removal may be questioned. Even with the implant in place, contact activities can be resumed. However, a new adequate trauma can create a new fracture independently if there is an implant in-situ or not. It is important to understand the complications and outcomes to be expected with hardware removal to carefully evaluate its indication.
-
Language
-
-
Open access status
-
closed
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/84159
Statistics
Document views: 18
File downloads: