Back
Neuroanatomy of intergroup bias: A white matter microstructure study of individual differences.
Journal article

Neuroanatomy of intergroup bias: A white matter microstructure study of individual differences.

  • Baumgartner T Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: thomas.baumgartner@psy.unibe.ch.
  • Nash K Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of Bern, Switzerland; Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Electronic address: kyle.nash@canterbury.ac.nz.
  • Hill C Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Knoch D Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland; Center for Cognition, Learning and Memory, University of Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: daria.knoch@psy.unibe.ch.
  • 2015-08-16
Published in:
  • NeuroImage. - 2015
Diffusion tensor imaging
Individual differences
Intergroup bias
Mentalizing
Neuroanatomy
White matter
Adult
Brain
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Female
Humans
Individuality
Male
Neural Pathways
Parietal Lobe
Prefrontal Cortex
Prisoner Dilemma
Punishment
Social Discrimination
Social Identification
Temporal Lobe
Theory of Mind
White Matter
Young Adult
English Intergroup bias-the tendency to behave more positively toward an ingroup member than an outgroup member-is a powerful social force, for good and ill. Although it is widely demonstrated, intergroup bias is not universal, as it is characterized by significant individual differences. Recently, attention has begun to turn to whether neuroanatomy might explain these individual differences in intergroup bias. However, no research to date has examined whether white matter microstructure could help determine differences in behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members. In the current research, we examine intergroup bias with the third-party punishment paradigm and white matter integrity and connectivity strength as determined by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We found that both increased white matter integrity at the right temporal-parietal junction (TPJ) and connectivity strength between the right TPJ and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) were associated with increased impartiality in the third-party punishment paradigm, i.e., reduced intergroup bias. Further, consistent with the role that these brain regions play in the mentalizing network, we found that these effects were mediated by mentalizing processes. Participants with greater white matter integrity at the right TPJ and connectivity strength between the right TPJ and the DMPFC employed mentalizing processes more equally for ingroup and outgroup members, and this non-biased use of mentalizing was associated with increased impartiality. The current results help shed light on the mechanisms of bias and, potentially, on interventions that promote impartiality over intergroup bias.
Language
  • English
Open access status
closed
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/44145
Statistics
Document views: 40 File downloads: