Conference paper (in proceedings)
Conspiracy and bias: Argumentative features and persuasiveness of conspiracy theories
Université de Fribourg
BLE-BLL
Published in:
- Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 / Benacquista, Laura ; Bondy, Pat. - 2016, p. 1-16
English
This paper deals with the argumentative biases conspiracy theories typically suffer from and pursues two goals: (i) it seeks to identify recurring argumentative and rhetorical features of conspiracy theories, which translates into an attempt to elaborate their argumentation profile (see Hansen 2013); (ii) it provides a cognitively-grounded account of conspiracy theories in terms of their persuasiveness, thus formulating clear hypotheses meant to explain their rhetorical appeal.
-
Faculty
- Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines
-
Department
- Département d'anglais
-
Language
-
-
Classification
-
Language, linguistics
- Other electronic version
-
Published version
-
License
-
License undefined
-
Open access status
-
green
-
Persistent URL
-
https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/323931
Statistics
Document views: 47
File downloads:
- 2016-oswald_ossa.pdf: 202