Control of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Review and Reanalysis of Quasi-experimental Studies.
-
Tomczyk S
Infection Prevention and Control Global Unit, Service Delivery and Safety Department, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
-
Zanichelli V
Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.
-
Grayson ML
Infectious Diseases Department, Austin Health, Victoria, Australia.
-
Twyman A
Infection Prevention and Control Global Unit, Service Delivery and Safety Department, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
-
Abbas M
Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.
-
Pires D
Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.
-
Allegranzi B
Infection Prevention and Control Global Unit, Service Delivery and Safety Department, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
-
Harbarth S
Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.
Show more…
Published in:
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. - 2019
English
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPsA) are a serious cause of healthcare-associated infections, although the evidence for their control remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and reanalysis to assess infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions on CRE-CRAB-CRPsA in inpatient healthcare facilities to inform World Health Organization guidelines. Six major databases and conference abstracts were searched. Before-and-after studies were reanalyzed as interrupted time series if possible. Effective practice and organization of care (EPOC) quality criteria were used. Seventy-six studies were identified, of which 17 (22%) were EPOC-compatible and interrupted time series analyses, assessing CRE (n = 11; 65%), CRAB (n = 5; 29%) and CRPsA (n = 3; 18%). IPC measures were often implemented using a multimodal approach (CRE: 10/11; CRAB: 4/5; CRPsA: 3/3). Among all CRE-CRAB-CRPsA EPOC studies, the most frequent intervention components included contact precautions (90%), active surveillance cultures (80%), monitoring, audit and feedback of measures (80%), patient isolation or cohorting (70%), hand hygiene (50%), and environmental cleaning (40%); nearly all studies with these interventions reported a significant reduction in slope and/or level. The quality of EPOC studies was very low to low.
-
Language
-
-
Open access status
-
hybrid
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/171361
Statistics
Document views: 25
File downloads: