Back
Full-text
Journal article

Effects of Scale, Question Location, Order of Response Alternatives, and Season on Self-Reported Noise Annoyance Using ICBEN Scales: A Field Experiment.

  • Brink M Federal Office for the Environment, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland. mark.brink@bafu.admin.ch.
  • Schreckenberg D ZEUS GmbH, D-58093 Hagen, Germany. schreckenberg@zeusgmbh.de.
  • Vienneau D Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. danielle.vienneau@unibas.ch.
  • Cajochen C Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. christian.cajochen@upkbs.ch.
  • Wunderli JM Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. jean-marc.wunderli@empa.ch.
  • Probst-Hensch N Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. nicole.probst@unibas.ch.
  • Röösli M Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. martin.roosli@unibas.ch.
Show more…
  • 2016-11-26
Published in:
  • International journal of environmental research and public health. - 2016
ICBEN scales
context effects
field experiment
noise annoyance
road traffic noise
season
survey methodology
Adult
Environmental Exposure
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Noise
Noise, Transportation
Research Design
Residence Characteristics
Seasons
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Weather
English The type of noise annoyance scale and aspects of its presentation such as response format or location within a questionnaire and other contextual factors may affect self-reported noise annoyance. By means of a balanced experimental design, the effect of type of annoyance question and corresponding scale (5-point verbal vs. 11-point numerical ICBEN (International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise) scale), presentation order of scale points (ascending vs. descending), question location (early vs. late within the questionnaire), and survey season (autumn vs. spring) on reported road traffic noise annoyance was investigated in a postal survey with a stratified random sample of 2386 Swiss residents. Our results showed that early appearance of annoyance questions was significantly associated with higher annoyance scores. Questionnaires filled out in autumn were associated with a significantly higher annoyance rating than in the springtime. No effect was found for the order of response alternatives. Standardized average annoyance scores were slightly higher using the 11-point numerical scale whereas the percentage of highly annoyed respondents was higher based on the 5-point scale, using common cutoff points. In conclusion, placement and presentation of annoyance questions within a questionnaire, as well as the time of the year a survey is carried out, have small but demonstrable effects on the degree of self-reported noise annoyance.
Language
  • English
Open access status
gold
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/124515
Statistics
Document views: 21 File downloads:
  • fulltext.pdf: 0