Oswald, Steve 2016 The notion of commitment has been shown to be pivotal in the study of argumentation (see e.g. Hamblin 1970, Walton & Krabbe 1995), in particular as far as argumentative reconstruction is concerned. In this chapter I will consider how the notion of commitment attribution, as developed in cognitive pragmatic research (Morency et al. 2008, Saussure & Oswald, 2008, 2009), can contribute clear criteria to be used in an analytical task argumentation theorists regularly have to undertake, namely the identification of missing or unexpressed premises. application/pdf https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/323932 https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/323932/files/2016-oswald-psyofarg.pdf eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess License undefined The Psychology of Argument. Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion / de Paglieri, Fabio ; Bonelli, Laura ; Felletti, Silvia. - College Publication. - 2016, p. 17-32 Commitment Argumentation Cognitive pragmatics Relevance theory Reconstruction info:eu-repo/classification/udc/81 Commitment Attribution and the Reconstruction of Arguments http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248