<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Wadji, Dany Laure</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Martin-Soelch, Chantal</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Camos, Valérie</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022-11-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Abstract&#13;
Background: Although eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been shown to be effective in&#13;
the treatment of PTSD for years, it remains controversial due to the lack of understanding of its mechanisms of action.&#13;
We examined whether the working memory (WM) hypothesis –the competition for limited WM resources induced by&#13;
the dual task attenuates the vividness and emotionality of the traumatic memory – would provide an explanation for&#13;
the beneficial effect induced by bilateral stimulation.&#13;
Methods: We followed the Prisma guidelines and identified 11 articles categorized in two types of designs: studies&#13;
involving participants with current PTSD symptoms and participants without PTSD diagnosis.&#13;
Results: Regardless of the types of studies, the results showed a reduction of vividness and emotionality in the recall&#13;
of traumatic stimuli under a dual-task condition compared to a control condition, such as recall alone. However, two&#13;
studies used a follow-up test to show that this effect does not seem to last long.&#13;
 Conclusion: Our results provide evidence for the WM hypothesis and suggest that recalling a traumatic memory&#13;
while performing a secondary task would shift the individual’s attention away from the retrieval process and result in a&#13;
reduction in vividness and emotionality, also associated with the reduction of symptoms.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/323732</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/323732/files/s40359-022-00951-02_1.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40359-022-00951-0</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2050-7283</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>CC BY</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>BMC Psychology. - Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2022, vol. 10, no. 245, p. 1-12</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Working memory</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Dual taxation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Eye movement</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Bilateral stimulation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/159.9</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Can working memory account for EMDR efficacy in PTSD?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
