<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Herman, Thierry</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Oswald, Steve</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">In the wake of research on linguistic resources of argumentation (Doury,  2018; van Eemeren Houtlosser, &amp; Snoeck Henkemans, 2007), this chapter  considers the argumentative nature and rhetorical potential of the  expression “everyone/everybody knows P”, which is likely to be used to  fulfil a justificatory purpose in appeals to majority in the form of ad populum  arguments (Godden, 2008). In this contribution, we draw on a rhetoric- pragmatic framework (Oswald &amp; Herman, 2016) to identify the linguistic  and cognitive underpinnings of argumentative resources in order to  account for a range of persuasive effects in argumentation. There is  something argumentatively odd about the expression “everybody knows  that P” under consideration here. Since the epistemic modality encoded by  the verb “to know” and the universal quantifier highlight that P is already  known and shared, one could indeed wonder about the relevance of P as  an argument: can an argument with little (if no) informative relevance serve  a justificatory purpose? Since this seems to be the case, as the argument  is widely used, we will show that the oddity can be explained away by  looking at the pragmatic and rhetorical import of the expression.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/309462</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/309462/files/2021-hermanoswald-adpopulum.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_16</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>The Language of Argumentation / Boogaart, Ronny ; Jansen, Henrike ; van Leeuwen, Maarten. - Springer. - 2021, p. 305-323</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Ad populum</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Pragmatics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Argumentation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Rhetoric</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Majority appeal</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Fallacy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/81</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Everybody Knows that There Is Something Odd About Ad Populum Arguments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
