<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Rochon, Louis-Philippe</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rossi, Sergio</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The ‘natural rate of unemployment’ was not an important part of Friedman’s  presidential address, although it is what the paper is remembered for. On the 50th  anniversary of the paper, we argue that there is no ‘natural rate of unemployment’,  and that the relation between inflation and unemployment is not the one assumed by  Friedman or neoclassical theory. In Section 2 we present the conventional framework  in which the Phillips curve is drawn by neoclassical economists. It emphasizes the  exogenous nature of money, as well as the assumption that (a large part of)  unemployment has to do with workers’ trade-off between paid work and leisure time  (in a utility maximization perspective). Section 3 explains that the neoclassical  framework is flawed, because money is endogenous and unemployment is not simply  an outcome of workers’ choices with regard to the observed ‘equilibrium’ wage level.  This section points out that inflation cannot be controlled with an interest-rate policy  and that unemployment is the result of a lack of effective demand (hence it is  involuntary). Section 4 provides two alternative macroeconomic analyses, one where  inflation as well as unemployment are explained by the disorderly working of the  banking system and another where conflict in the functional distribution of income  within a monetary economy of production dominates. The conclusion offers some  policy-oriented remarks as regards contemporary fiscal and monetary policies that a  variety of countries have been adopting in their (largely ineffective) attempt to emerge  from the crisis that erupted in 2008 at the global level – whose negative  consequences still affect a relevant part of the world population.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/309350</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/309350/files/2018_Rochon_Relationship.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4337/roke.2018.04.10</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Review of Keynesian Economics. - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. - 2018, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 533-544</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Friedman</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Post-Keynesian</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">NAIRU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">conflict inflation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">hysteresis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">The Relationship Between Inflation and Unemployment : a Critique of Friedman and Phelps</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
