<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Rukelj, Z.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Homes, C. C.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Orlita, M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Akrap, Ana</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-09-10</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Here we study the static and dynamic transport properties of a low-energy two-band  model proposed previously in Martino et al. [PRL 122, 217402 (2019)], with an  anisotropic in-plane linear momentum dependence and a parabolic out-of-plane  dispersion. The model is extended to include a negative band gap, which leads to the  emergence of a Weyl semimetal (WSM) state, as opposed to the gapped semimetal  (GSM) state when the band gap is positive. We calculate and compare the zero- and  finite-frequency transport properties of the GSM and WSM cases. The DC properties  that are calculated for the GSM and WSM cases are Drude spectral weight, mobility,  and resistivity. We determine their dependence on the Fermi energy and crystal  direction. The in- and out-of-plane optical conductivities are calculated in the limit of  the vanishing interband relaxation rate for both semimetals. The main common  features are an ω1/2 in-plane and ω3/2 out-of-plane frequency dependence of the  optical conductivity. We seek particular features related to the charge transport that  could unambiguously point to one ground state over the other, based on the  comparison with the experiment. Differences between the WSM and GSM are in  principle possible only at extremely low carrier concentrations and at low  temperatures.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308996</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308996/files/akr_dgw.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.125201</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Physical Review B. - 2020, vol. 102, no. 12, p. 125201</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/53</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Distinguishing the gapped and Weyl semimetal scenario in $\mathrm{Zr}{\mathrm{Te}}_{5}$: Insights from an effective two-band model</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
