<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Vimercati, Giovanni</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kumschick, Sabrina</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Probert, Anna F.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Volery, Lara</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bacher, Sven</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-10-15</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Extensive literature is available on the diversity and magnitude of impacts that alien  species cause on recipient systems. Alien species may decrease or increase  attributes of ecosystems (e.g. total biomass or species diversity), thus causing  negative and positive environmental impacts. Alien species may also negatively or  positively impact attributes linked to local human communities (e.g. the number of  people involved in a given activity). Ethical and societal values contribute to define  these environmental and socio-economic impacts as deleterious or beneficial. Whilst  most of the literature focuses on the deleterious effects of alien taxa, some recognise  their beneficial impacts on ecosystems and human activities. Impact assessment  frameworks show a similar tendency to evaluate mainly deleterious impacts: only  relatively few, and not widely applied, frameworks incorporate the beneficial impacts  of alien species. Here, we provide a summary of the frameworks assessing beneficial  impacts and briefly discuss why they might have been less frequently cited and  applied than frameworks assessing exclusively deleterious impacts. Then, we review  arguments that invoke a greater consideration of positive and beneficial impacts  caused by alien species across the invasion science literature. We collate and  describe arguments from a set of 47 papers, grouping them in two categories (value- free and value-laden), which span from a theoretical, basic science perspective to an  applied science perspective. We also provide example cases associated with each  argument. We advocate that the development of transparent and evidence-based  frameworks assessing positive and beneficial impacts might advance our scientific  understanding of impact dynamics and better inform management and prioritisation  decisions. We also advise that this development should be achieved by recognising  the underlying ethical and societal values of the frameworks and their intrinsic  limitations. The evaluation of positive and beneficial impacts through impact  assessment frameworks should not be seen as an attempt to outweigh or to discount  deleterious impacts of alien taxa but rather as an opportunity to provide additional  information for scientists, managers and policymakers.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308940</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308940/files/bac_iap.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3897/neobiota.62.52793</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>NeoBiota. - 2020, vol. 62, p. 525–545</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
