<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Soldati, Gianfranco</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Malbois, Elodie</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Short Abstract Sympathy is often considered to be a pro-attitude central to our social lives.  I argue, however,  that it is epistemically weak and thereby not effective on its own. We are in  need of another  attitude that combines the motivational aspect of sympathy with a more  cognitive component that  enables us to understand others. In this thesis, I argue that  availability, a concept  introduced by Gabriel Marcel, is just the candidate we are looking for. I offer  a definition of  availability, describe its effects and its role and argue that it is essential to  our social lives  because it allows us to help others efficiently and to bond with them. I apply  my results to  medical care and claim that availability should be promoted and taught in  medical schools. Long Abstract Empathy and sympathy are widely praised. Many consider that our ability  to be moved by the plight  of others is central to our social and moral lives. It unites us, allows us to  bond and, very  importantly, motivates us to act morally towards others by helping them. By  putting so much  emphasis on those emotional attitudes, however, we tend to forget that  understanding others  accurately is just as essential. We can be deeply empathetic and  sympathetic, but if we don’t  understand what someone needs, we will not be able to effectively help her.  Felt understanding is  also a key ingredient of bonding and satisfying relationships, and we all  seem to long for it. How  then can we make empathy or sympathy effective and how should we  complement them? I argue that  we  can find a strong candidate in Gabriel Marcel’s concept of availability. Availability seems to involve the motivational pro-social element of  sympathy, but in addition, it  puts us in an ideal position to understand others accurately. In the first part  of the 20ᵗʰ  century, several philosophers such as Marcel, as well as Simone Weil and  Martin Buber, described  availability and claimed it is crucial for our ability to relate to others.  However, none of them  provided a precise and systematic treatment of the notion. Although the  concept has been  popularised by Carl Rogers in psychotherapy under the names of  “empathy” and “active  listening”, it is still not clear what it is. Nonetheless, all those who speak  about it say that it  is highly important. The aim of this thesis is to build the case for availability  by investigating  more precisely what it is and what its effects are and to start to explore its  practical  applications by describing its role in the field of medical care. In the first part of the dissertation, I review existing accounts of availability  to see if we can  understand it better. I argue that these do not provide us with a definition of  availability, but  that they enable us to identify its four core features. Based on these  features, I am then able to  define availability. I can then describe the phenomenon more  precisely and  systematically and contrast it with other concepts that are closely related  and with which it could  be confused such as empathy, sympathy, care and respect. In the second part of the thesis, I investigate the effects of availability and  the role that it  plays in our social lives. I argue that it greatly enhances our chances to  understand another  accurately. I distinguish between two types of interpersonal understanding,  propositional and  experiential, to further describe the effects of availability. I claim that  being available  is an efficient way to come to know what others need and to be motivated  to help them. Although it  is not the only means to reach this result, availability has the advantage of  sustaining feelings  of sympathy and closeness which allow us to bond with others and to  develop relationships with  them. I also try to make sense of Marcel’s claim that we see others as  persons only when we are  available to them. To do that, I delve into what interpersonal understanding  consists in and why it  is so important to us and yields closeness. I finish by applying the work done to the domain of medicine. I argue that  the ability of  physicians to be available towards their patients is central to good care and  that it would be  better to promote availability rather than sympathy in medical schools. I  prepare the ground for  future research by discussing how the claims defended in this thesis could  be empirically tested and  how availability could be taught.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308886</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308886/files/MalboisE.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:rero-002-118840</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject>Marcel, Gabriel</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Empathie</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Éthique médicale</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/1</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Availability - analysis of an effective pro-social attitude and application to the medical field</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
