<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Eichenberger, Reiner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Tyahlo, Svitlana</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">This dissertation consists of four independent papers on economically  relevant topics that cap- tured my attention because of personal background and professional  experiences, such as coming from  Ukraine, being an educated woman, living in a bilingual Swiss region and  observing people delaying  their work. Throughout my papers, I empirically analyze the determinants  of individual attitudes  and behavior that entail important economic consequences. In particular,  the first two papers are  observational studies related to political economy and labor market policy,  respectively, while the  last two papers involve incentivized intertemporal choice experiments.  Analytical meth- ods are  carefully chosen to address specific research questions given the quantity  and quality of data.  Since the primary goal is to establish causal relationships, the results and  thus the identi- fying  assumptions are challenged with transparent robustness checks and  critical discussions. The papers  are organized in chapters as following. Chapter 1 evaluates the impact of  the ongoing war in eastern Ukraine on  the political attitudes towards Ukraine and Russia among the population  in the war-affected area  controlled by the Ukrainian government. This topic is important because  political sentiments can shape political  powers, voting outcomes and thus prospective institutions, which will  govern approaches to conflict  resolution and post-war economic recovery in the region. The war  geography allows defining two  groups of citizens with different war exposure. Based on unique survey  data from 2013 (prior to the  war) and 2015 (after the outbreak of the war), a before-after analysis and a  difference-in-difference approach are  applied to examine the effect of war exposure. The results indicate that  one year of conflict negatively affected  attitudes towards Russia, while no statistically robust differences are found  for sentiments towards Ukraine.  These findings are in line with the outcome of the 2014 Ukrainian  parliamentary elections, when the pro- Russian vote substantially dropped in eastern Ukraine compared to the  previous elections. In Chapter 2, I investigate long-run effects of education on female labor  market attachment  mediated by realized fertility. In the context of population ageing, educated  women are an im-  portant resource of labor supply. Investments into female education,  however, raise opportunity  costs of motherhood in terms of forgone earnings, leading to a trade-off  between labor force par-  ticipation and fertility decisions. It is therefore important to understand  whether education in-  creases female working lives mainly through reduced fertility. Using  mediation analysis supported  by the rich data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in  Europe, I find that school-  ing is positively associated with employment status, working hours and  labor survival age of older  women. Education-induced fertility modestly contributes to the total  schooling effects, which is stimulating news for policy makers. Chapter 3 sheds light on the relationship between language and time  preferences. While re- cent evidence suggests that the grammatical association of the present and  the future in a lan-  guage positively correlates with patience across language groups, the  underlying mechanisms re-  main unclear. Our study compares time preferences of two language  groups that differ in their  encoding of time. More precisely, we conduct incentivized choice  experiments among French and  German speakers in a bilingual region in Switzerland, with shared  institutions and very similar  socioeconomic conditions between the two language groups. We find that  German speakers are  significantly more patient than French speakers, and differences are  particularly pronounced when  immediate payments are involved. The estimated preference parameters  of a quasi-hyperbolic dis-  counting model suggest that German speakers display lower discounting  and are significantly less  prone to present bias than French speakers. Chapter 4 also examines  intertemporal choice behavior. The  context however differs. In a randomized real-effort experiment with  Amazon Mechanical Turk workers, I study  the impact of social comparison on intertemporal choice. Social  comparison entails varying information about effort reallocations of previous participants who completed a similar task. I  find that social compar-  ison affects effort allocations of men and women differentially. Observing  that 48% of past  partici- pants behaved time-consistently, men are significantly more likely to  make dynamically  consistent choices, while women are significantly less likely to do so. On  average, men also  exhibit signif- icantly smaller estimates of the present-bias parameter of a  quasi-hyperbolic  discounting model. I further find that observing peer procrastination  significantly increases the  propensity of women to behave time-consistently but does not affect men.  These findings suggest  that gender-specific social comparison based on situational similarity can  be an effective solution  to dynamic inconsistency in effort even when individual time preferences  are not known beforehand.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308838</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308838/files/TyahloS.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:rero-002-121144</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:subject>Éducation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Formation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Travail</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Bilinguisme</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Femmes</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Français (langue)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Allemand (langue)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Choix intertemporel</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Prise de décision</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Guerre du Donbass (2014-....)</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Politique et gouvernement</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ukraine</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Suisse</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Empirical Essays on Preference Formation and Economic Decision Making</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
