<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Cullati, Stéphane</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bochatay, Naike</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rossier, Clémentine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Guessous, Idris</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Burton‑Jeangros, Claudine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Courvoisier, Delphine S.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-05-20</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The self-rated health (SRH) item is frequently used in health surveys but variations of  its form (wording, response options) may hinder comparisons between versions over  time or across surveys. The objectives were to determine (a) whether three SRH  forms are equivalent, (b) the form with the best construct validity and (c) the best  coding scheme to maximize equivalence across forms.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308787</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308787/files/cul_dsi.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308787/files/cul_dsi_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11136-020-02533-2</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Quality of Life Research. - 2020, vol. 29, no. 9, p. 2593-2604</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/61</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Does the single-item self-rated health measure the same thing across different wordings? Construct validity study</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>