<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Kateb, Akram El</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Stalder, Claudio</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Martínez-Colón, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Mateu-Vicens, Guillem</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Francescangeli, Fabio</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Coletti, Giovanni</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Stainbank, Stephanie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Spezzaferri, Silvia</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-04-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Biotic indices are tools to assess the ecological status of marine systems, and  can be based on different metrics (such as ecological groups, specific diversity).  The present study applies five biotic indices based on living (stained) benthic  foraminiferal assemblages to assess ecological conditions in a wide area of the  Mediterranean Sea in the heavily polluted Gulf of Gabes and along the western  and eastern coasts of the Djerba Island, with the eastern coast considered as  “pristine”. The applied indices are based on epiphytic foraminifera e.g., the “long  versus short life span” index (ILS) and the modified FoRAM-Index (FI’), benthic  foraminiferal assemblage composition and diversity, e.g., the Tolerant Species  index (TSstd), the Foram Stress Index (FSI), the diversity Index (exp(H’bc)) and  the newly developed Foram-AZTI Marine Biotic Index (Foram-AMBI). This latter  index was tested using species of benthic foraminifera presently assigned to  ecological groups in the Mediterranean Sea. All indices confirm good ecological  conditions eastern of Djerba. The FI’ and ILS, % TSstd, FSI, indicate a severe  anthropogenic impact especially in the central part of the Gulf of Gabes, next to  the phosphate industry of Skhira and along the western coast of Djerba Island  and confirm direct observations and geochemical data. The indices based on  epiphytic foraminifera seem to better reflect actual environmental conditions in  the investigated region because of the extended Posidonia oceanica meadow in  the area. The exp(H’bc) reflects lower degrees of pollution. The application of  the Foram-AMBI index presents limitations that prevent its current use. It  strongly underestimates the pollution impact along the Tunisian coast, and  additional work is needed to increase the number of species attributed to  ecological groups and to possibly modify the coefficients to be used in its  equation.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308525</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308525/files/spe_fbb.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308525/files/spe_fbb_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105962</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Ecological Indicators. - 2020, vol. 111, p. 105962</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/55</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Foraminiferal-based biotic indices to assess the ecological quality status of the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia): Present limitations and future perspectives</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
