<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Terray, Léa</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Plateau, Olivia</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Abourachid, Anick</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Böhmer, Christine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Delapré, Arnaud</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>la Bernardie, Xavier de</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Cornette, Raphaël</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020-03-18</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The neck connects the head and the trunk and is the key structure allowing all  movements of the head. The neck morphology of birds is the most variable  among living tetrapods, including significant differences in the number and  shape of the cervical vertebrae. Despite these differences, according to the  literature, three morphofunctional regions (i.e., modules) have been identified  along the neck. However, this regionalization has not been quantitatively tested  through a geometric morphometric approach applied to the cervical vertebrae.  Based on the examination of 187 cervical vertebrae belonging to 16 species  with various ecologies, we revealed a common modular structure of the neck  using 3D surface geometric morphometrics. We adopted an approach without a  priori clustering to identify modules along the neck. The phylogenetic influence  on each module was tested. Then, each module was digitally reconstructed as  a 3D vertebral model, and postural characteristics were studied. We  characterized 9 modules: 7 are transpecific, being shared by at least 2 and up  to 15 species. Two modules are specific to species with particularly long necks.  The modularity pattern appears to be tightly linked to morphofunctional aspects  and partially to phylogeny. In contrast, feeding ecology seems to be more  closely related to the chaining of modules (the neck) than to the modules  themselves. A study of postural properties revealed that each modular unit  exhibits a characteristic curvature. Overall, the modular structure of the neck  corresponds to the three traditional functional regions. However, the results also  revealed unexpected pattern complexity, including subdivisions within these  regions. The study of the patterns of modularity is therefore a relevant approach  for challenging the three-functional-region hypothesis and allowed us to identify  the structure of the diversity of the necks of birds.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308375</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308375/files/pla_mnb.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308375/files/pla_mnb_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11692-020-09495-w</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Evolutionary Biology. - 2020, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 97-110</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Modularity of the neck in birds (Aves)</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
