<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Packham, Tara L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Spicher, Claude J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>MacDermid, Joy C.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Quintal, Isabelle</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Buckley, Norman D.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019-12-20</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Allodynia is a common feature of neuropathic pain with few validated clinical  evaluation options. We identified a need to estimate the measurement properties of  the standardised evaluation procedure for static mechanical allodynia severity  popularised by the somatosensory rehabilitation of pain method, known as the  rainbow pain scale. This study (www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT02070367) undertook  preliminary investigation of the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the rainbow pain  scale.Methods: Persons with pain in one upper extremity after Complex Regional Pain  Syndrome, a peripheral nerve injury or a recent hand fracture were recruited for  assessment of static mechanical allodynia threshold using calibrated monofilaments  by two raters at baseline, and repeated assessment one week later.Results: Single  measures estimates suggested inter-rater reliability was substantial for the rainbow  pain scale [intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.78 (n = 31), p &lt; 0.001]. Test-retest  reliability was also excellent at with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 [n = 28,  p &lt; 0.001]. However, confidence intervals suggest the true values could be more  moderate, with lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval at 0.60 and 0.74,  respectively.Conclusions: This pilot study has generated preliminary support for the  inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the rainbow pain scale. Future studies should  seek to increase confidence in estimates of reliability, and estimate validity and  responsiveness to change in persons with somatosensory disorders.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308351</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308351/files/spi_esi.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/08990220.2019.1704242</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Somatosensory &amp; Motor Research. - 2019, p. 1–6</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/61</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Evaluating a sensitive issue: reliability of a clinical evaluation for allodynia severity</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
