<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Huber, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lechner, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Mellace, Giovanni</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Using a comprehensive simulation study based on empirical data, this article investigates the ﬁnite sample properties of different classes of parametric and semiparametric stimators of (natural) direct and indirect causal effects used in mediation analysis under sequential conditional independence assumptions. The estimators are based on regression, inverse probability weighting, and combinations thereof. Our simulation design uses a large population of Swiss jobseekers and considers variations of several features of the data-generating process (DGP) and the implementation of the estimators that are of practical relevance. We ﬁnd that no estimator performs uniformly best (in terms of root mean squared error) in all simulations. Overall, so-called “g-computation” dominates. However, differences between estimators are often (but not always) minor in the various setups and the relative performance of the methods often (but not always) varies with the features of the DGP.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308278</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308278/files/thefinitesampleperformanceofestimators.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308278/files/thefinitesampleperformanceofestimatorsformediationanalysisundersequentialconditionalindependence_0.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/07350015.2015.1017644</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Journal of Business &amp; Economic Statistics. - American Statistical Association. - 2016, vol. 34, no. 1, p. 139-160</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Causal channels</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Causal mechanisms</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Direct effects</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Empirical Monte Carlo study</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Indirect effects</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Simulation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">The Finite Sample Performance of Estimators for Mediation Analysis Under Sequential Conditional Independence</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
