<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Roux, Camille</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kaeser, Mélanie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Savidan, Julie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fregosi, Michela</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rouiller, Eric M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Schmidlin, Eric</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Non-invasive reversible perturbation techniques of brain output such as continuous  theta burst stimulation (cTBS), commonly used to modulate cortical excitability in  humans, allow investigation of possible roles in functional recovery played by distinct  intact cortical areas following stroke. To evaluate the potential of cTBS, the  behavioural effects of this non-invasive transient perturbation of the hand  representation of the primary motor cortex (M1) in non-human primates (two adult  macaques) were compared with an invasive focal transient inactivation based on  intracortical microinfusion of GABA-A agonist muscimol. The effects on the  contralateral arm produced by cTBS or muscimol were directly compared based on a  manual dexterity task performed by the monkeys, the “reach and grasp” drawer task,  allowing quantitative assessment of the grip force produced between the thumb and  index finger and exerted on the drawer's knob. cTBS only induced modest to  moderate behavioural effects, with substantial variability on manual dexterity whereas  the intracortical muscimol microinfusion completely impaired manual dexterity,  producing a strong and clear cortical inhibition of the M1 hand area. In contrast, cTBS  induced mixed inhibitory and facilitatory/excitatory perturbations of M1, though with  predominant inhibition. Although cTBS impacted on manual dexterity, its effects  appear too limited and variable in order to use it as a reliable proof of cortical  vicariation mechanism (cortical area replacing another one) underlying functional  recovery following a cortical lesion in the motor control domain, in contrast to potent  pharmacological block generated by muscimol infusion, whose application is though  limited to an animal model such as non-human primate.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/308275</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308275/files/rou_aec.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/308275/files/rou_aec_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/ejn.14517</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>European Journal of Neuroscience. - 2019, vol. 50, no. 10, p. 3599-3613</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Assessment of the effect of continuous theta burst stimulation of the motor cortex on manual dexterity in non-human primates in a direct comparison with invasive intracortical pharmacological inactivation</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
