<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Dukić, Marinela</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Berner, Daniel</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Haag, Christoph R.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ebert, Dieter</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Due to the lack of recombination, asexual organisms are predicted to accumulate  mutations and show high levels of within‐individual allelic divergence (heterozygosity);  however, empirical evidence for this prediction is largely missing. Instead, evidence of  genome homogenization during asexual reproduction is accumulating. Ameiotic  crossover recombination is a mechanism that could lead to long genomic stretches of  loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and unmasking of mutations that have little or no effect in  heterozygous state. Therefore, LOH might be an important force for inducing variation  among asexual offspring and may contribute to the limited longevity of asexual  lineages. To investigate the genetic consequences of asexuality, here we used high‐ throughput sequencing of Daphnia magna for assessing the rate of LOH over a single  generation of asexual reproduction. Comparing parthenogenetic daughters with their  mothers at several thousand genetic markers generated by restriction site‐associated  DNA (RAD) sequencing resulted in high LOH rate estimation that largely overlapped  with our estimates for the error rate. To distinguish these two, we Sanger re‐ sequenced the top 17 candidate RAD‐loci for LOH, and all of them proved to be false  positives. Hence, even though we cannot exclude the possibility that short stretches of  LOH occur in genomic regions not covered by our markers, we conclude that LOH  does not occur frequently during asexual reproduction in D. magna and ameiotic  crossovers are very rare or absent. This finding suggests that clonal lineages of D.  magna will remain genetically homogeneous at least over time periods typically  relevant for experimental work.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307983</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307983/files/haa_hca.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jeb.13443</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Journal of Evolutionary Biology. - 2019, vol. 32, no. 6, p. 619–628</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">How clonal are clones? A quest for loss of heterozygosity during asexual reproduction in Daphnia magna</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
