<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Simonet, Marie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Crettaz von Roten, Fabienne</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Spierer, Lucas</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Barral, Jérôme</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">How executive function training paradigms can be effectively designed to promote a  transfer of the effects of interventions to untrained tasks remains unclear. Here, we  tested the hypothesis that training with a complex task involving motor, perceptual and  task-set control components would result in more transfer than training with a simple  motor control task, because the Complex training would lead to more involvement— and in turn modification—of domain-general executive control networks.We compared  performance and electrophysiological activity before and after 10 days of executive  control training with the complex (n = 18) versus the simple task (n = 17). We further  assessed the effect of the two training regimens on untrained executive tasks  involving or not one of the trained control components. A passive control group  (n = 19) was used to assess retest effects.Both training groups improved at the trained  task but exhibited different plastic changes within left-lateralized and medial frontal  areas at 200–250 ms post-stimulus onset. However, contrary to our hypotheses, they  showed equivalent improvement to the passive group to the transfer tasks.Our  collective results reveal that the effect of training with a task involving multiple  executive control components is highly specific to the trained task, even when the  training modifies the functional networks underlying the trained executive  components. Our findings corroborate current evidence that general cognitive  enhancement cannot be achieved with training, even when the interventions modify  domain-general brain areas.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307917</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307917/files/spi_ect.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307917/files/spi_ect_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.010</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>NeuroImage. - 2019, vol. 197, p. 457–469</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Executive control training does not generalize, even when associated with plastic changes in domain-general prefrontal areas</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
