<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Lauber, Benedikt</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kurz, Alexander</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gollhofer, Albert</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Taube, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019-02-18</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Motor interference can be observed when two motor tasks are learnt in subsequent  order. The aim of the current study was to test two approaches potentially mitigating  interference effects. The first approach used contextual colour cues requiring only little  cognitive attention thus being assumed to be primarily implicit while the second,  mental practice/rehearsal that demands much more active cognitive processing being  considered explicit.Six groups performed a ballistic strength training immediately  followed by the practice of an interfering visuomotor tracking task. Two groups  received a contextual colour cue when presenting feedback about ballistic  performance. During the practice of the interfering motor task, one of the two groups  received the same colour cue during random trials while the other group received a  different colour cue and a third control group no colour cue at all. The forth group  mentally rehearsed the ballistic task during the practice of the interference task, while  the respective control groups either mentally rehearsed a ramp and hold contraction  instead of the ballistic task or didn’t rehearse any task. The ballistic performance was  tested before and after the ballistic training and in an immediate retention test after the  learning of the interfering motor task.All groups significantly increased their ballistic  performance after training. After practicing the interfering motor tracking, subjects  receiving the same colour cue and subjects that mentally rehearsed the ballistic task  did not show significant interference effect while all other groups did. These results  indicate that implicit cuing with the same cue as well as explicit mental rehearsal of  the initially learnt task can help to prevent motor interference without affecting  performance improvements of the second motor task.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307756</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307756/files/tau_mic.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.010</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Neuropsychologia. - 2019, vol. 124, p. 202–207</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Mental imagery and colour cues can prevent interference between motor tasks</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
