<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Saj, Arnaud</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Verdon, Vincent</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hauert, Claude-Alain</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Vuilleumier, Patrik</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-07-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Spatial neglect is a complex neuropsychological disorder, in which patients fail to  detect and respond to contralesional stimuli. Recent studies suggest that these  symptoms may reflect a combination of different component deficits, associated with  different lesion substrates. Thus, damage to right lateral prefrontal and inferior parietal  regions produce different degrees of left neglect on cancellation and line bisection  tasks, respectively. Here we tested for dissociable behaviors across two tasks  designed to assess distinct cognitive processes possibly mediating such components,  in 14 patients with right focal lesion in either the frontal or parietal lobe. In the  “distractor filtering” task, patients had to respond to a visual target presented centrally,  with or without a lateralized distractor. Only frontal-lesioned patients showed a marked  slowing of reaction times when a central target appeared with a simultaneous right  distractor (compared to center and left distractor). In the “spatial coding” task, patients  had to detect a target among successive visual stimuli presented horizontally with  three sequence conditions (regular/predictive or irregular/non-predictive). Only  parietal-lesioned patients were unable to benefit from the predictability of the target  position, with similar reaction times across all sequence conditions. By contrast,  frontal patients showed faster reaction times on trials with a regular succession of  stimuli (compared to random order). Taken together, these results suggest that frontal  damage may contribute to left inattention by disrupting top-down control and  resistance to distractors on the ipsilesional side, whereas parietal damage may disrupt  the maintenance of stable locations in space across gaze shifts or time. This further  supports the notion that left neglect may arise as a combined breakdown or impaired  connectivity between frontal and parietal mechanisms involved (respectively) in the  selective control and memory storage components of spatial attention.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307426</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307426/files/ver_dcs.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.021</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Neuropsychologia. - 2018, vol. 115, p. 60–69</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Dissociable components of spatial neglect associated with frontal and parietal lesions</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
