<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Müller, Manfred J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Geisler, Corinna</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Blundell, John</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dulloo, Abdul G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Schutz, Yves</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Krawczak, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bosy-Westphal, Anja</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Enderle, Janna</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Heymsfield, Steven B.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">As yet, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have not added much to our  understanding of the mechanisms of body weight control and of the etiology of  obesity. This shortcoming is widely attributed to the complexity of the issues. The  appeal of this explanation notwithstanding, we surmise that (i) an oversimplification of  the phenotype (namely by the use of crude anthropometric traits) and (ii) a lack of  sound concepts of body weight control and, thus, a lack of a clear research focus  have impeded better insights most. The idea of searching for polygenetic mechanisms  underlying common forms of obesity was born out of the impressive findings made for  monogenetic forms of extreme obesity. In the case of common obesity, however,  observational studies on normal weight and overweight subjects never provided any  strong evidence for a tight internal control of body weight. In addition, empirical  studies of weight changes in normal weight and overweight subjects revealed an intra-  individual variance that was similar to inter-individual variance suggesting the absence  of tight control of body weight. Not least, this lack of coerciveness is reflected by the  present obesity epidemic. Finally, data on detailed body composition highlight that  body weight is too heterogeneous a phenotype to be controlled as a single entity. In  summary GWAS of obesity using crude anthropometric traits have likely been misled  by popular heritability estimates that may have been inflated in the first place. To  facilitate more robust and useful insights into the mechanisms of internal control of  human body weight and, consequently, the genetic basis of obesity, we argue in favor  of a broad discussion between scientists from the areas of integrative physiologic and  of genomics. This discussion should aim at better conceived studies employing  biologically more meaningful phenotypes based on in depth body composition  analysis. To advance the scientific community—including the editors of our top  journals—needs a re-launch of future GWAS of obesity.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307330</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307330/files/dul_cgo.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41366-018-0081-6</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>International Journal of Obesity. - 2018, vol. 42, no. 8, p. 1395–1405</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">The case of GWAS of obesity: does body weight control play by the rules?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
