<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Nsikani, M. M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Wilgen, B. W. van</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bacher, Sven</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gaertnera, M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-05-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Invasive Australian acacias can alter soil chemistry and microbial communities in  areas they invade. After clearing invasive acacias, these changes can persist, and  previously invaded areas can become dominated by nitrophilic weedy species.  Restoration of viable native plant communities in cleared sites often fails due to a lack  of native species re-establishment. Therefore, to improve restoration outcomes, it is  important to understand the effects of soil chemical and biotic legacies, and of  nitrophilic weedy species, on native species re-establishment. To investigate the effect  of soil chemical legacies, we germinated and grew Protea repens seedlings (a native  proteoid shrub) as an indicator species in soil taken from areas cleared of Acacia  saligna in lowland fynbos, as well as from non-invaded areas under controlled  conditions. To investigate the effect of soil biotic legacies, we sterilized half the soil  from each cleared or non-invaded area. We grew Ehrharta calycina (a native  nitrophilic weedy grass species) in half of each treatment and measured the effect of  treatments on P. repens germination and growth. Germination percentage, root and  shoot dry mass of P. repens did not significantly differ between altered and native soil  chemistry. The germination percentage of P. repens was significantly greater (93%) in  the presence of soil microbial communities than in their absence. The presence of E.  calycina significantly increased (29%) the root-to-shoot ratio of P. repens than their  absence. Since the legacy of altered soil chemistry did not have a direct negative  effect on P. repens germination and growth; we conclude that restoration efforts do not  always have to manage altered soil chemistry after clearing invasive A. saligna.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307322</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307322/files/bac_rpr.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307322/files/bac_rpr_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.396</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>South African Journal of Botany. - 2018, vol. 116, p. 103–109</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Re-establishment of Protea repens after clearing invasive Acacia saligna: Consequences of soil legacy effects and a native nitrophilic weedy species</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
