<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Eppler, Elisabeth</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Meyer, Jan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Serowy, Steffen</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Link, Karl</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Pauk, Barbara</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Filgueira, Luis</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-12-13</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">This educational study aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptance of a literacy  exercise adopted from the realworld of scientific publishing in a cell and tissue biology  course. For that purpose, a tertiary-level multimodality science course, which  integrated a blended learning faculty and student lectures, journal club, and wet  laboratory sessions including a research project as well as examinations, was  complemented by essaywriting of a review and peerreviewing of five manuscripts. All  tasks contributed to the final course mark. Special emphasis was laid on the usability  of different E-Learning applications for scientific writing and teacher- and  peerassessment procedures. Further, potential influences of student characteristics  on their peerand self-assessments as well as their acceptance of the feedback from  their peers were evaluated. Seventy-five undergraduate students from different  Bachelor programs were included in the study. Plagiarism check and double-blind  assessments of the essays were performed using “Turnitin.com.” Students self- assessed their paper and received feedback from five peers and the teacher. Peer  assessment was more severe than the teacher- or self-assessment, and the peer  mark correlated best with the final course mark. Students with better marks assessed  more generously, and there had moderate tendencies for influences of gender and  background on peer feedback behavior. The students perceived the writing and  assessment exercises, especially being peer-assessed, as demanding, but rewarding  and a great learning experience. The additional tasks were feasible using E-Learning  technology, which should foster future biomedical courses to train writing skills and the  ability to cope with different roles in the scientific community.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307268</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307268/files/fil_esc.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307268/files/fil_esc_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11165-018-9795-7</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Research in Science Education. - 2021, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 277-299</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Communication skills</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Scientific writing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Peer assessment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Self-assessment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">E-learning</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Blended learning</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Plagiarism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Peer review</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/61</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">Enhancing scientific communication skills: a real-world simulation in a tertiary-level life science class using e-learning technology in biomedical literature perception, reflective review writing on a clinical issue, and self and peer assessments</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
