<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Schlup, Barbara</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Meyer , Andrea H.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Munsch , Simone</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2010-08-06</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">BACKGROUND: To compare treatment outcomes of a cognitive-behavioral long-term (CBT-L) and short-term (CBT-S) treatment for binge eating disorder (BED) in a non-randomized comparison and to identify moderators of treatment outcome. METHODS: 76 female patients with BED participated in the study: 40 in CBT-L and 36 in CBT-S. Outcome values were compared at the end of the active treatment phase (16 sessions for CBT-L, 8 sessions for CBT-S) and at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Both treatments produced significant reductions in binge eating. At the end of active treatment, but not at the end of follow-up, effects of primary outcomes (e.g. remission from binge eating, EDE shape concern) were better for CBT-L than for CBT-S. Dropout rates were significantly higher in CBT-L (35%) than in CBT-S (14%). Moderator analyses revealed that treatment efficacy for rapid responders and individuals exhibiting high scores on the mixed dietary negative affect subtype differed between the CBT-L and CBT-S with respect to objective binges, restraint eating and eating concern. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that CBT in general represents an effective treatment for BED, but that subgroups of patients might profit more from a prolonged treatment. Short, less-intensive CBT treatments could nevertheless be a viable option in the treatment of BED.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/307172</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/307172/files/doi10.1159000319538anon-randomizeddirectcomparisonofcognitive-behavioralshort-andlong-termtreatmentforbingeeatingdisorder.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1159/000319538</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Obesity Facts. - 2010, vol. 3, p. 261–266</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Quasi experiment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Binge eating disorder</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Treatment duration</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">CBT</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Moderator</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/159.9</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">A Non-Randomized Direct Comparison of Cognitive-Behavioral Short- and Long-Term Treatment for Binge Eating Disorder</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>