<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Mishra, Abhishek Kumar</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bernardo-Garcia, F. Javier</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fritsch, Cornelia</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Humberg, Tim-Henning</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Egger, Boris</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Sprecher, Simon G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-04-20</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The central nervous system develops from monolayered neuroepithelial sheets. In a  first step patterning mechanisms subdivide the seemingly uniform epithelia into  domains allowing an increase of neuronal diversity in a tightly controlled spatial and  temporal manner. In Drosophila, neuroepithelial patterning of the embryonic optic  placode gives rise to the larval eye primordium, consisting of two photoreceptor (PR)  precursor types (primary and secondary), as well as the optic lobe primordium, which  during larval and pupal stages develops into the prominent optic ganglia. Here, we  characterize a genetic network that regulates the balance between larval eye and  optic lobe precursors, as well as between primary and secondary PR precursors. In a  first step the proneural factor Atonal (Ato) specifies larval eye precursors, while the  orphan nuclear receptor Tailless (Tll) is crucial for the specification of optic lobe  precursors. The Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways act upstream of Ato and Tll  to coordinate neural precursor specification in a timely manner. The correct spatial  placement of the boundary between Ato and Tll in turn is required to control the  precise number of primary and secondary PR precursors. In a second step, Notch  signaling also controls a binary cell fate decision, thus, acts at the top of a cascade of  transcription factor interactions to define PR subtype identity. Our model serves as an  example of how combinatorial action of cell extrinsic and cell intrinsic factors control  neural tissue patterning.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/306988</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306988/files/spr_pmd.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306988/files/spr_spm_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007353</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>PLOS Genetics. - 2018, vol. 14, no. 4, p. e1007353</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Patterning mechanisms diversify neuroepithelial domains in the Drosophila optic placode</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
