<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Márquez, Gonzalo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Keller, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Taube, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-03-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Research has indicated that at the onset of a finger movement, unwanted contractions  of adjacent muscles are prevented by inhibiting the cortical areas representing these  muscles. This so-called surround inhibition (SI) seems relevant for the performance of  selective finger movements but may not be necessary for tasks involving functional  coupling between different finger muscles. Therefore, the present study compared SI  between isolated finger movement and complex selective finger movements while  playing a three-finger sequence on the piano in nine non-professional musicians and  10 untrained control participants. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was  applied to the contralateral motor cortex to assess SI in the first dorsal interosseous  (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during the  movement preparation and the late phasic phases. The results reveal stronger SI  during the preparation phase than during the phasic phase (30.6% vs. 10.7%; P  &lt;  0.05) in the isolated-finger condition in both musicians and controls. Results also  show higher SI in musicians during the preparation phase of the isolated finger  condition compared to the preparation phase of the three-finger sequence (40% vs.  15%; P  &lt; 0.05). However, the control group did not show this task-specific modulation  of SI (isolated: 25% vs. sequence: 25%; P &gt; 0.05). Thus, musicians were able to  modulate SI between conditions whereas control participants revealed constant levels  of SI. Therefore, it may be assumed that long-term training as observed in skilled  musicians is accompanied by task-specific effects on SI modulation potentially relating  to the ability to perform selective and complex finger movements.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/306628</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306628/files/tau_sip.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Neuroscience. - 2018, vol. 373, p. 106–112</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
