<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Wang, Yong-Jian</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Müller-Schärer, Heinz</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kleunen, Mark van</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Cai, Ai-Ming</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Zhang, Ping</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Yan, Rong</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dong, Bi-Cheng</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Yu, Fei-Hai</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-12-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">What confers invasive alien plants a competitive advantage over native plants  remains open to debate. Many of the world's worst invasive alien plants are clonal and  able to share resources within clones (clonal integration), particularly in  heterogeneous environments. Here, we tested the hypothesis that clonal integration  benefits invasive clonal plants more than natives and thus confers invasives a  competitive advantage.We selected five congeneric and naturally co-occurring pairs of  invasive alien and native clonal plants in China, and grew pairs of connected and  disconnected ramets under heterogeneous light, soil nutrient and water conditions  that are commonly encountered by alien plants during their invasion into new  areas.Clonal integration increased biomass of all plants in all three heterogeneous  resource environments. However, invasive plants benefited more from clonal  integration than natives. Consequently, invasive plants produced more biomass than  natives.Our results indicate that clonal integration may confer invasive alien clonal  plants a competitive advantage over natives. Therefore, differences in the ability of  clonal integration could potentially explain, at least partly, the invasion success of alien  clonal plants in areas where resources are heterogeneously distributed.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/306392</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306392/files/mue_iap.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306392/files/mue_iap_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/nph.14820</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>New Phytologist. - 2017, vol. 216, no. 4, p. 1072–1078</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">clonal growth</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">clonal traits</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">invasiveness</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">multi-species comparison</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">physiological integration</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">resource heterogeneity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Invasive alien plants benefit more from clonal integration in heterogeneous environments than natives</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
