<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Eppler, Elisabeth</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Serowy, Steffen</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Link, Karl</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Filgueira, Luis</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-01-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Profound anatomical knowledge is the basis for modern demands in medicine and  surgery, but many countries worldwide including Australia and New Zealand have  discontinued offering dissection courses to medical and dental students during the  past decades. This educational project done in Australia aimed at enhancing basic  and advanced anatomy teaching by engaging a sub-group of second-year  undergraduate students of a compulsory prosection- and model-based anatomy  course (n = 54/170) in an optional multimodal course, which should easily articulate  with a vertical curriculum. With topographical cadaver dissections as core, peer  student-teams prepared and peer-assessed anatomy lectures based on clinical topics,  which were rated highly by the peers and teachers. Anatomical knowledge was tested  by quizzes and a multiple-choice examination. Individual dissection skills were self-  and teacher-assessed. A final course grade was assigned based on these  assessments. The grades in the system-based compulsory course achieved by the  attendees of the paralleling dissection course were compared with their peers  attending other optional courses. After beginning of the semester, the students in the  dissection course performed similar, significantly (P &lt; 0.005) improved during the  semester (78.5% vs. 69.9%, 70.1% vs. 64.1%), but in the integrated (including  anatomy, biochemistry, physiology) final examination at the end of the year only  tended to higher scores. As assessed through interviews and a voluntary  questionnaire, all students of the optional dissection course liked these activities,  which enhanced their learning experience. Thus, this concept elegantly integrates  anatomical dissection with modern teaching demands and is feasible for  implementation in modernized curricula.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/306324</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306324/files/fil_eod.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306324/files/fil_eod_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ase.1707</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Anatomical Sciences Education. - 2018, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 32–43</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Gross anatomy education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Medical education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Undergraduate education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Supplemental instruction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Team-based learning</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Peer-assessment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Cadaver dissection</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/61</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Experience from an optional dissection course in a clinically‐orientated concept to complement system‐based anatomy in a reformed curriculum</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
