<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Stutz, Sonja</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Mráz, Patrik</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hinz, Hariet L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Müller-Schärer, Heinz</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Schaffner, Urs</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018-01-04</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Species may become invasive after introduction to a new range because phenotypic  traits pre-adapt them to spread and become dominant. In addition, adaptation to novel  selection pressures in the introduced range may further increase their potential to  become invasive. The diploid Leucanthemum vulgare and the tetraploid L. ircutianum  are native to Eurasia and have been introduced to North America, but only L. vulgare  has become invasive. To investigate whether phenotypic differences between the two  species in Eurasia could explain the higher abundance of L. vulgare in North America  and whether rapid evolution in the introduced range may have contributed to its  invasion success, we grew 20 L. vulgare and 21 L. ircutianum populations from  Eurasia and 21 L. vulgare populations from North America under standardized  conditions and recorded performance and functional traits. In addition, we recorded  morphological traits to investigate whether the two closely related species can be  clearly distinguished by morphological means and to what extent morphological traits  have changed in L. vulgare post-introduction. We found pronounced phenotypic  differences between L. vulgare and L. ircutianum from the native range as well as  between L. vulgare from the native and introduced ranges. The two species differed  significantly in morphology but only moderately in functional or performance traits that  could have explained the higher invasion success of L. vulgare in North America. In  contrast, leaf morphology was similar between L. vulgare from the native and  introduced range, but plants from North America flowered later, were larger and had  more and larger flower heads than those from Eurasia. In summary, we found litte  evidence that specific traits of L. vulgare may have pre-adapted this species to  become more invasive than L. ircutianum, but our results indicate that rapid evolution  in the introduced range likely contributed to the invasion success of L. vulgare.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/306318</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306318/files/mue_bio.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190705</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>PLOS ONE. - 2018, vol. 13, no. 1, p. e0190705</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Biological invasion of oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare) in North America: Pre-adaptation, post-introduction evolution, or both?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
