<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Wächli, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tokuno, Craig D.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ruffieux, Jan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Keller, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Taube, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-12-04</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Little is known about how the central nervous system prepares postural responses  differently in anticipated compared to non-anticipated perturbations. To investigate  this, participants were exposed to translational and rotational perturbations presented  in a blocked (anticipated) and a random (non-anticipated) design. The preparatory  setting (‘central set’) was measured by H-reflexes, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs),  and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) shortly before perturbation onset in the  soleus of 15 healthy adults. Additionally, the behavioral consequences of differential  preparatory settings were analyzed by comparing the short- (SLR), medium- (MLR),  and long-latency response (LLR) of the soleus after anticipated and non-anticipated  rotations and translations. H-reflexes elicited before perturbation were different  between conditions (p=0.023) with larger amplitudes in anticipated translations  compared to anticipated rotations (37.0%; p=0.048). Reduced SICI was found in the  three conditions containing perturbations compared to static standing (p0.001).  Muscular responses assessed after perturbations remained unchanged for the SLR  and MLR, whereas the LLR was decreased in anticipated rotations (−36.2%; p=0.002)  and increased in anticipated translations (16.7%; p=0.046) compared to the  corresponding non-anticipated perturbation. As the SLR and MLR are organized at  the spinal and the LLR at the cortical level, the preparatory setting seems to mainly  influence cortically mediated postural responses. However, the modulation of the H- reflex before anticipated perturbations indicates that supraspinal centers adjusted Ia- afferent transmission for the soleus in a perturbation-specific manner. Intracortical  inhibition was also modulated but differentiates to a lesser extent only between  perturbation conditions and unperturbed stance.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/306234</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/306234/files/tau_pcs.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.032</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Neuroscience. - 2017, vol. 365, no. Supplement C, p. 12–22</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Preparatory cortical and spinal settings to counteract anticipated and non-anticipated perturbations</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
