<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Neumann, Paul E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Baud, Robert</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Sprumont, Pierre</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-09-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Here, new rules of Latin anatomical nomenclature are proposed to deal with cases not  covered by existing or other recommended rules. Determiners (e.g., numerals, letters,  alphanumeric strings, and Latin names of Greek letters) should follow the noun they  specify or limit, just as it is recommended that adjectives should follow the noun they  modify. In general, Roman numerals, Latin letters, and Latin names of Greek letters  are preferable to Arabic numerals and Greek letters in Latin anatomical terms. It is  also noted that the word typus (type) appears to be superfluous and unnecessary in  the Latin anatomical nomenclature. Clin. Anat. 30:700–702, 2017. © 2017Wiley  Periodicals, Inc.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305980</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305980/files/bau_ona.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ca.22912</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Clinical Anatomy. - 2017, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 700–702</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Ordering by the numbers in anatomy and by letters Too</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
