<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Sandau, Nadine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fabian, Yvonne</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bruggisser, Odile T.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rohr, Rudolf P.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Naisbit, Russell E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kehrli, Patrik</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Aebi, Alexandre</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bersier, Louis-Félix</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-06-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">How species diversity influences ecosystem functioning has been the subject of many  experiments and remains a key question for ecology and conservation biology.  However, the fact that diversity cannot be manipulated without affecting species  composition makes this quest methodologically challenging. Here, we evaluate the  relative importance of diversity and of composition on biomass production, by using  partial Mantel tests for one variable while controlling for the other. We analyse two  datasets, from the Jena (2002–2008) and the Grandcour (2008–2009) Experiments.  In both experiments, plots were sown with different numbers of species to unravel  mechanisms underlying the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem  functioning (BEF). Contrary to Jena, plots were neither mowed nor weeded in  Grandcour, allowing external species to establish. Based on the diversity–ecosystem  functioning and competition theories, we tested two predictions: 1) the contribution of  composition should increase with time; 2) the contribution of composition should be  more important in non-weeded than in controlled systems. We found support for the  second hypothesis, but not for the first. On the contrary, the contribution of species  richness became markedly more important few years after the start of the Jena  Experiment. This result can be interpreted as suggesting that species  complementarity, rather than intraspecific competition, is the driving force in this  system. Finally, we explored to what extent the estimated relative importance of both  factors varied when measured on different spatial scales of the experiment (in this  case, increasing the number of plots included in the analyses). We found a strong  effect of scale, suggesting that comparisons between studies, and more generally the  extrapolation of results from experiments to natural situations, should be made with  caution.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305901</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305901/files/ber_rcs.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305901/files/ber_rcs_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/oik.03901</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Oikos. - 2017, vol. 126, no. 6, p. 782–791</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">The relative contributions of species richness and species composition to ecosystem functioning</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
