<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Miles-Chan, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fares, Elie-Jacques</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Berkachy, Redina</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Jacquet, Philippe</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Isacco, Laurie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Schutz, Yves</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Montani, Jean-Pierre</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dulloo, Abdul G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-04-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Due to sedentarity-associated disease risks, there is much interest in methods to  increase low-intensity physical activity. In this context, it is widely assumed that  altering posture allocation can modify energy expenditure (EE) to impact body-weight  regulation and health. However, we have recently shown the existence of two distinct  phenotypes pertaining to the energy cost of standing—with most individuals having no  sustained increase in EE during steady-state standing relative to sitting comfortably.  Here, we investigated whether these distinct phenotypes are related to the  presence/absence of spontaneous “weight-shifting”, i.e. the redistribution of body- weight from one foot to the other.Methods: Using indirect calorimetry to measure EE in  young adults during sitting and 10 min of steady-state standing, we examined: (i)  heterogeneity in EE during standing (n = 36); (ii) EE and spontaneous weight-shifting  patterns (n = 18); (iii) EE during spontaneous weight-shifting versus experimentally  induced weight-shifting (n = 7), and; (iv) EE during spontaneous weight-shifting versus  intermittent leg/body displacement (n = 6).Results: Despite heterogeneity in EE  response to steady-state standing, no differences were found in the amount or pattern  of spontaneous weight-shifting between the two phenotypes. Whilst experimentally  induced weight-shifting resulted in a mean EE increase of only 11% (range: 0–25%),  intermittent leg/body displacement increased EE to &gt;1.5 METs in all  participants.Conclusions: Although the variability in spontaneous weight-shifting  signatures between individuals does not appear to underlie heterogeneity in the energy  cost of standing posture maintenance, these studies underscore the fact that leg/body  displacement, rather than standing posture alone, is needed to increase EE above the  currently defined sedentary threshold.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305621</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305621/files/dull_sed.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00421-017-3563-7</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>European Journal of Applied Physiology. - 2017, vol. 117, no. 4, p. 795–807</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/613.2</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Standing economy: does the heterogeneity in the energy cost of posture maintenance reside in differential patterns of spontaneous weight-shifting?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
