<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Collet, Carlos</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Asano, Taku</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Miyazaki, Yosuke</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tenekecioglu, Erhan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Katagiri, Yuki</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Sotomi, Yohei</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Cavalcante, Rafael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Winter, Robbert J. de</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kimura, Takeshi</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gao, Runlin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Puricel, Serban</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Cook, Stéphane</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Capodanno, Davide</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Onuma, Yoshinobu</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Serruys, Patrick W.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">To compare the long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS)  with everolimus-eluting stent (EES) after percutaneous coronary  interventions.Methods and Results: A systematic review and meta-analysis of  randomized clinical trials comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated with BVS and  EES with at least 24 months follow-up was performed. Adjusted random-effect model  by the Knapp–Hartung method was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95%  confidence intervals (CI). The primary safety outcome of interest was the risk of  definite/probable device thrombosis (DT). The primary efficacy outcome of interest  was the risk of target lesion failure (TLF). Five randomized clinical trials (n = 1730)  were included. Patients treated with Absorb BVS had a higher risk of definite/probable  DT compared with patients treated with EES (OR 2.93, 95%CI 1.37–6.26, P = 0.01).  Very late DT (VLDT) occurred in 13 patients [12/996 (1.4%, 95%CI: 0.08–2.5) Absorb  BVS vs. 1/701 (0.5%, 95%CI: 0.2–1.6) EES; OR 3.04; 95%CI 1.2–7.68, P = 0.03], 92%  of the VLDT in the BVS group occurred in the absence of dual antiplatelet therapy  (DAPT). Patients treated with Absorb BVS had a trend towards higher risk of TLF (OR  1.48, 95%CI 0.90–2.42, P = 0.09), driven by a higher risk of target vessel myocardial  infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization. No difference was  found in the risk of cardiac death.Conclusion: Compared with EES, the use of Absorb  BVS was associated with a higher rate of DT and a trend towards higher risk of TLF.  VLDT occurred in 1.4% of the patients, the majority of these events occurred in the  absence of DAPT.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305617</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305617/files/coo_lte.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx155</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>European Heart Journal. - 2017, vol. 38, no. 33, p. 2559-2566</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/616</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Late thrombotic events after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
