<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Muccione, Veruska</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Salzmann, Nadine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Huggel, Christian</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016-08-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Mountain ecosystems around the world are recognized to be among the most  vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The need to develop sound adaptation  strategies in these areas is growing. Knowledge from the natural sciences has an  important role to play in the development of adaptation strategies. However, the extent  of and gaps in such knowledge have not been systematically investigated for  mountain areas. This paper analyzes the status of knowledge from natural science  disciplines and research needs relevant to the national and subnational climate  adaptation policies of 1 US state (Washington) and 7 countries (Austria, Bhutan,  Colombia, Germany, Nepal, Peru, and Switzerland), in particular the elements of  those policies focused on mountain areas. In addition, we asked key individuals  involved in drafting those policies to answer a short questionnaire. We found that  research needs mainly concern impact and vulnerability assessments at regional and  local levels, integrated assessments, and improved climate and socioeconomic data.  These needs are often related to the challenges to data coverage and model  performance in mountainous areas. In these areas, the base data are often riddled  with gaps and uncertainties, making it particularly difficult to formulate adaptation  strategies. In countries where data coverage is less of an issue, there is a tendency  to explore quantitative forms of impact and vulnerability assessments. We highlight  how the knowledge embedded in natural science disciplines is not always useful to  address complex vulnerabilities in coupled human and natural systems and briefly  refer to alternative pathways to adaptation in the form of no-regret, flexible, and  adaptive management solutions. Finally, in recognition of the trans- and  interdisciplinary nature of climate change adaptation, we raise the question of which  knowledge production paradigms are best able to deliver sustainable adaptations to  growing environmental stressors in mountain regions.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305343</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305343/files/sal_skk.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00016.1</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Mountain Research and Development. - 2016, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 364–375</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/55</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Scientific knowledge and knowledge needs in climate adaptation policy: a case study of diverse mountain regions</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
