<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Monnard, Cathriona R.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Miles-Chan, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017-01-05</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The disease risks associated with sedentary behavior are now firmly established, and  consequently there is much interest in methods of increasing low-intensity physical  activity. In this context, it is a widely held belief that altering posture allocation can  modify energy expenditure (EE) to impact upon body weight regulation and health.  However, we recently showed the existence of two distinct phenotypes pertaining to  the energy cost of standing–with the majority of a Caucasian cohort showing no  sustained increase in EE during standing relative to sitting. Here we investigated  whether this phenomenon is also observed across a multi-ethnic male  cohort.Objective: To determine the magnitude and time-course of changes in EE and  respiratory quotient (RQ) during steady-state standing versus sitting, and to explore  inter-individual variability in these responses across 4 ethnic groups (European, Indian,  Chinese, African)Design: Min-by-min monitoring using posture-adapted ventilated-hood  indirect calorimetry was conducted in 35 healthy, men (20–43 years) during 10 min of  steady-state standing versus sitting comfortably.Results: 69% of subjects showed little  or no increase (&lt;5%) in EE during standing compared to sitting (energy savers).  Furthermore, the proportion of energy savers did not significantly differ between ethnic  groups, despite ethnic differences in anthropometry; with body weight as the primary  predictor of the energy cost of standing maintenance (r2 = 0.30, p = 0.001).Conclusion:  Our results indicate that the majority of individuals in a multi-ethnic cohort display a  postural energy-saver phenotype. The mechanisms by which the large majority of  individuals appear to maintain sitting and standing postures at the same energetic cost  remains to be elucidated but is of considerable importance to our understanding of the  spontaneous physical activity compartment of EE and its potential as a target for  weight regulation.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305289</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305289/files/mil_ecs.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305289/files/mil_ecs_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0169478</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>PLOS ONE. - 2017, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e0169478</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Energy cost of standing in a multi-ethnic cohort: are energy-savers a minority or the majority?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
