<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Sarafian, Delphine</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Miles-Chan, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">The body's ability to rapidly and appropriately regulate blood pressure in response to  changing physiological demand is a key feature of a healthy cardiovascular system.  Passively tilting the body, thereby changing central blood volume, is a well-recognized  and controlled method of evaluating this ability. However, such studies usually involve  single tilt angles, or intermittent tilting separated by supine, resting periods; valuable  information concerning the adaptive capacity of the regulatory systems involved is  therefore currently lacking. Furthermore, despite increasing recognition that men and  women differ in the magnitude of their haemodynamic response to such stimuli, little is  known about the degree to which gender differences in body composition and  anthropometry influence these regulatory pathways, or indeed if these differences are  apparent in response to graded, incremental tilting. In the present study we measured,  in 23 young, healthy adults (13 men, 10 women), the continuous beat-to-beat  haemodynamic response to graded, incremental tilting (0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, and back to  40°) with each tilt angle lasting 16 min. On average, we observed increases in heart  rate (+41%), blood pressure (+10%), and total peripheral resistance (+16%) in  response to tilting. However, whilst men showed an immediate decrease in cardiac  output upon tilting (−8.9%) cardiac output in women did not change significantly from  supine values. Interestingly, the decrease in stroke volume observed in women was  significantly less than that observed in men (−22 vs. −36%, &lt;i&gt;p &lt; 0.05); although the  present study could not determine if this difference was due to gender &lt;i&gt;per se or due  to differences in body size (in particular height) between the two gender groups. Such  disparities in the magnitude of autonomic response may indicate (in the case of our  gradual incremental tilt procedure) a better buffering capacity to progressive changes  in central blood volume in women; which warrants further investigation, particularly in  light of the well-recognized differences in cardiovascular disease risk between men  and women.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/305279</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/305279/files/mil_iga.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fphys.2016.00656</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Frontiers in Physiology. - 2017, vol. 7, p. 656</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">The influence of gender and anthropometry on haemodynamic status at rest and in response to graded incremental head-up tilt in young, healthy adults</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
