<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Wälchli, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ruffieux, Jan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bourquin, Yann</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Keller, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Taube, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Different approaches like providing augmented feedback (aF), applying an external  focus of attention (EF), or rewarding participants with money (RE) have been shown to  instantly enhance motor performance. So far, these approaches have been tested  either in separate studies or directly against each other. However, there is no study  that combined aF, EF, and/or RE to test whether this provokes additional benefits. The  aim of the present study was therefore to identify the most powerful  combination.Methods: Eighteen participants performed maximal countermovement  jumps in six different conditions: neutral (NE), aF, RE, aF + EF, aF + RE, and aF + EF +  RE.Results: Participants demonstrated the highest jump heights with aF + EF, followed  by aF + EF + RE, aF + RE, aF, RE, and finally, NE. Activity of the M. rectus femoris  differed significantly between conditions resulting in lower muscular activity in aF + EF  and aF + EF + RE compared with NE. All other parameters, such as ground reaction  forces and joint angles, were comparable across conditions.Conclusions: This is the  first study showing superior performance when combining aF with EF. As reduced  muscular activity was found only in conditions with EF, it is argued in line with the  constrained action hypothesis that adopting an EF improves movement efficiency. In  contrast, aF seems to rather enhance (intrinsic) motivation. However, monetary  reward did not further amplify performance.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/304845</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/304845/files/tau_mpa.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000818</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Medicine &amp; Science in Sports &amp; Exercise. - 2016, vol. 48, no. 4, p. 714–719</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Maximizing performance: augmented feedback, focus of attention, and/or reward?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
