<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Stutz, Sonja</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Štajerová, Kateřina</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hinz, Hariet L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Müller-Schärer, Heinz</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Schaffner, Urs</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016-04-29</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Enemy release is a commonly accepted mechanism to explain plant invasions. Both  the diploid Leucanthemum vulgare and the morphologically very similar tetraploid  Leucanthemum ircutianum have been introduced into North America. To verify which  species is more prevalent in North America we sampled 98 Leucanthemum  populations and determined their ploidy level. Although polyploidy has repeatedly been  proposed to be associated with increased invasiveness in plants, only two of the  populations surveyed in North America were the tetraploid L. ircutianum. We tested the  enemy release hypothesis by first comparing 20 populations of L. vulgare and 27  populations of L. ircutianum in their native range in Europe, and then comparing the  European L. vulgare populations with 31 L. vulgare populations sampled in North  America. Characteristics of the site and associated vegetation, plant performance and  invertebrate herbivory were recorded. In Europe, plant height and density of the two  species were similar but L. vulgare produced more flower heads than L. ircutianum.  Leucanthemum vulgare in North America was 17 % taller, produced twice as many  flower heads and grew much denser compared to L. vulgare in Europe. Attack rates  by root- and leaf-feeding herbivores on L. vulgare in Europe (34 and 75 %) was  comparable to that on L. ircutianum (26 and 71 %) but higher than that on L. vulgare in  North America (10 and 3 %). However, herbivore load and leaf damage were low in  Europe. Cover and height of the co-occurring vegetation was higher in L. vulgare  populations in the native than in the introduced range, suggesting that a shift in plant  competition may more easily explain the invasion success of L. vulgare than escape  from herbivory.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/304809</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/304809/files/mue_can_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/304809/files/mue_cee.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/304809/files/mue_cer.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10530-016-1152-z</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Biological Invasions. - 2016, p. 1–15</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Can enemy release explain the invasion success of the diploid Leucanthemum vulgare in North America?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
