<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Rohr, Rudolf P.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bascompte, Jordi</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014-11-01</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Recent studies have shown a phylogenetic signal in the structure of ecological  networks, making the point that evolutionary history is important in explaining network  architecture. However, this previous work has focused on either antagonistic (i.e.,  predator-prey) or mutualistic networks and has used different methodologies. Thus, a  comparative assessment of both the frequency and the strength of phylogenetic signal  across network types and components of network structure has been precluded.  Here, we address this issue using a data set comprising 60 antagonistic and  mutualistic networks. By quantifying simultaneously the matching and centrality  components of network architecture—capturing the modular and nested structure,  respectively—we test the presence and quantify the strength of phylogenetic signal  across network types, species sets, and components of network structure. We find  contrasting differences across such groups. First, phylogenetic signal is stronger in  antagonistic webs than in mutualistic webs. Second, resources are more strongly  constrained than consumers in food webs, while animals show more constraints than  plants in mutualistic networks. Third, phylogenetic constraints are stronger for the  matching component than for the centrality component of network structure. These  results can shed light on the contrasting evolutionary constraints shaping network  structure across interaction types and species sets.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/304066</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/304066/files/roh_cps.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/304066/files/roh_cps_sm.pdf</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1086/678234</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5061/dryad.5m0m5</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>License undefined</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>The American Naturalist. - 2014, vol. 184, no. 5, p. 556–564</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Food webs</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Plant pollinator networks</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Plant frugivore networks</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Phylogeny</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/udc/57</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Components of phylogenetic signal in antagonistic and mutualistic networks.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
