Ralston, David A. Egri, Carolyn P. Reynaud, Emmanuelle Srinivasan, Narasimhan Furrer, Olivier Brock, David Alas, Ruth Wangenheim, Florian Darder, Fidel León Kuo, Christine Potocan, Vojko Mockaitis, Audra I. Szabo, Erna Gutiérrez, Jaime Ruiz Pekerti, Andre Butt, Arif Palmer, Ian Naoumova, Irina Lenartowicz, Tomasz Starkus, Arunas Hung, Vu Thanh Dalgic, Tevfik Molteni, Mario de la Garza Carranza, María Teresa Maignan, Isabelle Castro, Francisco B. Moon, Yong-lin Terpstra-Tong, Jane Dabic, Marina Li, Yongjuan Danis, Wade Kangasniemi, Maria Ansari, Mahfooz Riddle, Liesl Milton, Laurie Hallinger, Philip Elenkov, Detelin Girson, Ilya Gelbuda, Modesta Ramburuth, Prem Casado, Tania Rossi, Ana Maria Richards, Malika Van Deusen, Cheryl Fu, Ping-Ping Wan, Paulina Man Kei Tang, Moureen Lee, Chay-Hoon Chia, Ho-Beng Fan, Yongquin Wallace, Alan 2011 This article provides current Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) data from samples of business managers and professionals across 50 societies that are culturally and socioeconomically diverse. We report the society scores for SVS values dimensions for both individual- and societallevel analyses. At the individual-level, we report on the ten circumplex values sub-dimensions and two sets of values dimensions (collectivism and individualism; openness to change, conservation, self-enhancement, and self- transcendence). At the societal-level, we report on the values dimensions of embeddedness, hierarchy, mastery, affective autonomy, intellectual autonomy, egalitarianism, and harmony. For each society, we report the Cronbach’s a statistics for each values dimension scale to assess their internal consistency (reliability) as well as report interrater agreement (IRA) analyses to assess the acceptability of using aggregated individual level values scores to represent country values. We also examined whether societal development level is related to systematic variation in the measurement and importance of values. Thus, the contributions of our evaluation of the SVS values dimensions are two-fold. First, we identify the SVS dimensions that have cross-culturally internally reliable structures and withinsociety agreement for business professionals. Second, we report the society cultural values scores developed from the twenty-first century data that can be used as macro-level predictors in multilevel and single-level international business research. application/pdf https://folia.unifr.ch/global/documents/303894 https://folia.unifr.ch/documents/303894/files/2011_d_a_ralstonc_p_egrie_reynaudn_srinivasano_furrer_et_al_journal-of-business-ethics-1-1.pdf eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10551-011-0835-8 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess License undefined Journal of business ethics. - 2011, vol. 104, no. 1, p. 1-31 Cultural values International management Schwartz Values Survey info:eu-repo/classification/udc/3 A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501